A message to the community on parking from Chief Hurley

Press Release
City of Fernandina Beach
James T. Hurley
Chief of Police
July 12,, 2017 5:13 p.m.

Is there a parking problem or a walking problem? We have heard repeatedly how this complex topic can be boiled down to this one simple recipe, like so many shrimp in a bag. However, by framing the discussion in this manner we risk losing sight of the fact that both answers are correct. In fact, shaping the debate in these general terms does not serve the greater purpose of finding consensus or directing that appropriate action be taken to resolve the issue.

It might even be considered rude or dismissive to suggest that a parking problem does not exist merely because one believes that walking a relatively short distance is a desirable aspect of the downtown experience, although unquestionably the more people that embrace the Fitbit mentality the better any parking proposal will work.

Many visitors are unfamiliar with the exact location of their destination, the one-way street pattern, and available public lots or street parking options. They simply wish to eliminate confusion in favor of convenience. They prefer to pay for prime parking on the main corridors where they intend to eat and shop. In this way “prime parking” becomes the focus of discussion, as it always does.

Yes, of course there is a parking problem! Any place worth going to is going to have a parking problem!

To be sure, much has been written about parking concerns in downtown Fernandina Beach. In fact, way back in 1947 the City Commission instructed the City Manager to open negotiations for the purchase of parking meters, and then tabled the discussion. Individual meters were later installed, only to be decommissioned. As you know, this tumultuous issue has been left unresolved ever since the last pole was sawed down on Centre Street. We have posted some of the more recent and notable efforts on the City website so that anyone interested in this topic can find the referenced material in one place.

I was delighted (Lol) to learn recently that I had been chosen to chair a committee specifically tasked with making recommendations about downtown parking, or as some disparaging letters suggest, run roughshod over the political process by seeking only staff opinions. Never one to shrink from a challenge, I have been meeting with city staff members, Rex Lester, Kelly Gibson, Jeremiah Glisson and Andre Desilet on a regular basis to prepare for an August 1st deadline for presentation to the City Commission. Of course, the commission can choose to take action or not in any number of ways, but clearly this issue remains a political decision point, and many stakeholders will be affected in the short and long term. Taking a clue from James Comey, I decided to share the thinking of the committee in advance of the presentation so that those hanging on the edge of their seats can take a breath.

For anyone familiar with this discussion, “analysis paralysis” should be on the tip of your tongue. Keeping that in mind the committee decided early on to rely on the body of work already compiled to form a base of knowledge from which to proceed. Clearly we do have a parking problem if the topic is brought back to the forefront every couple of years! Simple observation and common sense confirm what the studies have already told us about human nature and the search for convenience. Our observation and enforcement efforts confirm that those working in the downtown core arrive earlier, take advantage of prime parking, and often jockey their vehicles to avoid the current three hour limit on parking. Compounding the problem, human nature suggests they are less likely to “do the right thing” when they see their neighbors consistently violating the same unwritten rules.

Suffice to say, many people truly cannot walk several blocks to their destination, or prefer to enjoy the convenience of prime parking while on vacation in unfamiliar surroundings, or when pressed for time but still anxious to enjoy our wonderful downtown restaurants. Paying a reasonable charge for the best parking is hardly a new concept. As the 2002 Walker study rightfully pointed out, fee-based parking is the most efficient way to manage the turnover of prime, convenient parking spaces. The study also opined that a two hour limit might be a reasonable solution, if adequately enforced.

Admittedly, enforcement has been a challenge, especially with reduced staffing levels over the past several years. The Police Department has primarily relied on a part-time Police Service Aide for enforcement and education, to include handing out brochures produced in partnership with the Amelia Island Tourism and Development Council, and talking with business owners and visitors. We have recently assigned Officers Jorge Hernandez and Christina Woods to permanent downtown duty and hopefully their efforts are being immediately felt.

The committee also recognized that a very vocal minority often dominate and splinter the discussion, so the committee was challenged to identify those deemed to have the very most at stake, a priority interest so to speak, and we decided to first focus on the Historic Downtown Merchants Association. It is appropriate that we consider those that are emotionally and financially invested in our downtown and to attempt to hear the prevailing voice. We were not sure how this poll would take shape. If the businesses in our downtown are clearly opposed to paid parking, why should we make such a recommendation to our elected officials? Would the potential for parking revenue, even if earmarked for downtown improvements and additional parking, outweigh the will of those most affected by the decision? We didn’t think so, but we wanted this group to weigh in on the topic.

We met with the downtown business owners at City Hall on June 15th and discussed these issues at length. We then provided every downtown business, between Ash and Alachua, and Eighth Street to Front Street, with a survey instrument asking, among other things, if they supported paid parking for those spaces considered “prime” or “convenient” to local businesses, as in those spaces along Centre Street and the perpendicular roadways from 2nd to 5th Streets, while leaving City lots and other perimeter parking free of charge. Perhaps surprisingly, nearly half the respondents chose to initiate paid parking under these conditions.

The committee will host a public meeting at the Police Department on Friday, July 14th, at 6:00 PM to further discuss the issues of paid parking.

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Dave Lott
Dave Lott(@dave-l)
6 years ago

Very comprehensive review. The fact that nearly half the downtown businesses are in favor of limited paid parking and the other half aren’t is a clear illustration as to why there hasn’t been any resolution of this issue over the past decade or more. I don’t think this “report” will change anyone’s mind as I don’t sense there is any new information. It appears that a number of employees of the Centre Street businesses are still taking up a number of the “prime” parking spaces despite enforcement efforts. Hard to resolve an attitude of selfishness.
I think another parking study (like the 2009 Walker Study) needs to be performed where quantifiable measurements are gathered to support a series of recommendations by professional parking/traffic consultants. Sure, people opposed to the findings and recommendations are going to argue their point of view, but when you have quantifiable data and not just anecdotal examples, the findings should be accepted by the vast majority and the City can move forward with the recommended solutions.

tony crawford
tony crawford (@guest_49180)
6 years ago

Sounds like the old rock and a hard place scenario. I find it very interesting that so many merchants are in favor of paid parking. My thoughts would be that the more foot traffic you have walking around downtown the more exposure your business would get. I know from personal experience the more stores my wife and I walk past the more we are drawn to go in and shop and the less money we have in our pocket at the end of the night. I think this problem,be it a walking problem or a parking problem, is only going to get worse over time. I feel that Someone with the expereance of Chief Hurley should be listened to with whatever recommendations he brings to the City. I am sure that whatever happens it will not be a fix- all and will not please many. I do however feel he has no dog in this race and has the practical knowledge to make help make the best decisions needed to help solve this problem