Poynter states port position and offers final thoughts prior to runoff election – Corbett silent

December 2, 2014 1:00 a.m.

Editor’s Note: The Fernandina Beach City Commission Candidates Charlie Corbett and Timothy Poynter were asked by the Fernandina Observer to state their position on issues surrounding the Port of Fernandina and offer final thoughts prior to the December 9 run off election. Incumbent Charlie Corbett did not respond to our request.

In the runoff election, voters will choose between incumbent Charlie Corbett and Timothy Poynter. If you wish to vote early, you may stop by the election’s office located at the historic courthouse on Centre Street

Thank you for the chance to reiterate my vision for the long-term interests of this special place we all call home and to make sure Fernandina remains economically healthy, vibrant and attractive for future generations. I have a positive plan for our city’s future and the drive and leadership to make things happen. I believe in smart government and have the financial experience and business sense to get our city moving again without raising taxes. Here are a few of the current issues that deserve our utmost attention now, not years from now.

* I want the port to do well, but I’m against port expansion that would threaten our neighborhoods, our environment, the island’s quality of life and our public safety. Encroaching on our historic district or generating an increase in traffic is not good for our city. I intend to be a commissioner who will stay on top of the port issues.

I will work to improve 8th Street, to make the entrance to our city more welcoming and a better place for small businesses to thrive.

I support funding for non-profit organizations that help those in need. For every $10 the city gives, the non-profit gets back $100 in matching funds from State and Federal grants. This is money well-spent.

I support cleaning up Front St. and the riverfront. After 30 years of talking about it, it’s time to do something about it.

I will work to find the funds to fix our flooded streets now, not wait until there’s a disastrous overflow.

I will protect our beaches, our most important asset.

Change is inevitable. If we have strong leadership and a serious plan for the future, Fernandina Beach will thrive and age gracefully.

If you would like to talk to me about these issues or others, drop by Café’ Karibo for a chat. LIKE our Facebook page Tim Poynter Campaign. I want to thank those who voted for me on Nov. 4. I appreciate your support. Please get out and vote again in the runoff on Tuesday, Dec. 9.

26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Peggy Bulger
Peggy Bulger(@peggy-bulger1949gmail-com)
9 years ago

This is a no-brainer!! Tim Poynter is the man to elect and he’s a proven leader in our community. This is not a popularity race, this is an election that will determine the future of Fernandina Beach. We need commissioners who will make the hard decisions to ensure the good of all — not take the easy way out. At this point in time Kinder-Morgan is a real threat to our island (they are currently being sued by several communities where they have set up operations and have degraded the environment and culture of their host communities). Google them and read all about it. I hope for the sake of all of us that our City and County Commissioners will pull up their “big boy” and “big girl” knickers and do the hard work of governing! I know that Tim Poynter will be one to jump in and do the hard work . . . please vote!!

Steven Crounse
Steven Crounse (@guest_24753)
9 years ago
Reply to  Peggy Bulger

If we want a commission that has a long range view of opportunities for our community. If we want a clean environment, stable economy, continued family friendly place to live and work. We desperately need people of Mr. Poynters intellect and passion for our town. Vote Dec. 9th. Vote for Tim Poynter. PS Peggy and all. Sightline, a environmental watch dog on the west coast. Knows Kinder Morgans history, illegal dumping of toxic wast at sea. polluting rivers with coal. Gas leaks in pipelines through it’s 80,000 mile system. Work place safety issues. Anyway Sightline Institute is coming out with a new report on” our neighbor in the cage”in the next week or two. Last report was 2012.

Stumpjumper
Stumpjumper (@guest_24756)
9 years ago
Reply to  Steven Crounse

This is a no brainier! Mr. Poynter is the best choice for FB! He is his own man and will not make decisions based on a few elected officials in our county. Just remember this, when Mr. Poynter is elected, next up will be Commissioner Gass and a few County Constitutional offices. This is our county and cities, not a select few power grabbers. Good luck Mr. Poynter!

tony crawford
tony crawford (@guest_24762)
9 years ago

For those who want Poynter to win, they have to do one simple thing—VOTE.
A run off election doesn’t always reflect the wishes of the community. It reflects the individuals who are interested enough to get their candidate voted in. Simply put, make that extra effort to VOTE and encourage all your friends to vote . The election is Dec 9th 7am to 7pm. You can also go to the Historic Court house ( 2nd fl ) and early vote as well as go to The James S Page Complex in Yulee. These two locations will give you a mail-in ballot that you can fill out and hand back to them. These locations will not be open for voting on Dec 9th. This is not considered “early voting” however. You will receive a mail-in ballot, fill it out and they will accept it.—-go figure, gotta love the City. If you are still on the fence, ask yourself—-are you happy with the way the City has been going? Just remember to vote. The next few years are going to be critical to our City. We need leadership. We need the local charities supported. We need to do something about the 30 year embarrassment of the waterfront. We need to stop talking and get of the dime and get some stuff done.

FB Tax Payer
FB Tax Payer (@guest_24774)
9 years ago
Reply to  tony crawford

Mr. Poynter says all the right things

But remember he was a commissioner and has a record. Look at his record along with Mr. Cobert’s when voting. Remember Mr Poynter voted to burrow the Forward Money in a lame duck meeting after two incumbents lost because of the program.

Many of his stated positions failed to product results when he was in office.

Check the records when voting.

Dave Lott
Dave Lott(@dave-l)
9 years ago
Reply to  FB Tax Payer

My recollection is that ALL 5 Commissioners voted to borrow the funds.

FB Tax Payer
FB Tax Payer (@guest_24783)
9 years ago
Reply to  Dave Lott

It was 4-1. The issue is that rather than wait until the next meeting when new Commissioners were seated decided to ignore the voters. I believe Commissioner Bunch voted against.

Dave Lott
Dave Lott(@dave-l)
9 years ago
Reply to  FB Tax Payer

TaxPayer, You are right that the vote was 4-1 with Jeff Bunch voting no; but it is informative to look at the minutes and see the context of Jeffrey’s no vote. As shown in http://74.113.103.198/weblink8/0/doc/131983/Page1.aspx Jeffrey made it clear that he was not voting against the overall Forward Fernandina plan or the loan itself, but some specific elements within the plan such as using an outside project engineer. In fact, Jeffrey was the lead person for the City working with Danny Leeper to come up with a solution for the library’s needs with the full expectation that funds would come from the F2 loan.

tony crawford
tony crawford (@guest_24777)
9 years ago

Yes by all means check the record. Start with acquiring funds for Forward Fernandina at less than 3%. Check what happened to that money and who gave it back. Check on the projects that were started only to have the low interest funds returned thus cancelling the projects. Check on who is willing to change our policy with respect charity funding. Check if the flooding issue has been fixed and check if any improvements have been made to 8th St. check who all along supported the construction of the Library. I totally agree with FB Tax Payer. Whoever he or she might be please check the record—then make a wise choice.

Dave Lott
Dave Lott(@dave-l)
9 years ago

What many people don’t realize about the F2 low interest money was that the loan was frontended with a host of origination fees (like a mortgage) and other costs. I think the total was in the $30,000 – $35,000 amount. When the majority of the money was returned there was no rebates or adjustments on those fees. So when you add that cost to the short time the loan was on the books, the effective interest rate would increase substantially. One would have to have a lot of data to figure out the exact effective interest rate but I am sure it was in the double digits.
Tim has a vision and he articulates and stands true to that vision, but he is willing to listen to others and take that information into consideration before he makes his final decision. As others have said, the important thing is to get out and vote!

Mark Ross
Mark Ross(@mrossjax)
9 years ago

Unfortunately…. tonight’s vote was very disappointing!!
The majority of Existing City Commissioners are NOT listening!!
If they ARE listening, as one Commisioner claimed at the conclusion of the meeting, NOT ONE of “their” constituents spoke up in the meeting in favor of the vote they cast.

This Tuesday, December 9th, there is a Run-Off Election between Tim Poynter and Charlie Corbett!!!

Tim Poynter
is
Pro Community
and
Pro Historic Preservation

Based on historical votes Charlie Corbett, is not!!!

Tonight, Charlie Corbett voted in favor of re-zoning lots in the Historic District in favor of Port Expansion that in turn compromises the integrety of the Historic District and the over all well being of the community.

In a “Lame Duck” Commision Meeting, Sarah Pelican also voted in favor of re zoning in the Historic District in favor of Port expansion. She has already been voted out of office and will not have a vote next go round.

Pat Gass voted in favor of re-zoning that compromises the Historic District. Unfortunately, we can’t do anything about that until next term.

The only control we have as a community, is our vote in the Run-Off election against Charlie Corbett and Tim Poynter.

Where we can make a difference today…. VOTE!!!

Run-Off Elections are typically not well attended…
EVERY VOTE COUNTS!!!
PLEASE GET OUT AND VOTE ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 9.
(Early voting starts tomorrow at the election office).

VOTE
TIM POYNTER

Save the Historic District!!!
This is one mans opinion….
Get out and vote before it is too late!!!

Keith Waldrip
Keith Waldrip (@guest_24793)
9 years ago

Tonight, the City Commission, in their infinite wisdom, voted 3-2 in favor of port expansion within the Historic District. Commissioners Corbett, Gass and Pelican voted in favor giving continued support to the port’s expansion. A second vote will take place most likely in January,2015. If you have strong feelings concerning the port “creep” that these Commissoners support, please vote in the runoff election this Tuesday, December 9th between Charlie Corbett and Tim Poynter. Mr. Pointer is a voice of reason and does not support, as does Mr. Corbett, port expansion into the Historic District. I urge everyone to consider this important issue and cast your vote accordingly.

Robert Warner
Robert Warner (@guest_24808)
9 years ago

Agree with Mark Ross here. My feeling is that should we turn our backs on the Historic District, we also need to look at the private interests of those presently holding office (in city and county government) – and assess objectivity. But it may be too late. This run off is critical to our future direction.

tony crawford
tony crawford (@guest_24815)
9 years ago

Mark, just to clear something up. If anyone calls the City and asked about early voting they may be told ” there is no early voting “. This is technically correct. You can go to the Court House downtown or to the James S Page Complex in Yulee and they will give you a (mail in ) ballot that you can fill out and hand in right there. Hard to explain the difference between this method of voting and ” early ” voting but there is a lot of legal mumbo jumbo dealing with the wording. So to make it simple—you can ( and please do ) vote early at the Court House or in Yulee using a mail in ballot which they will provide you and than accept. Sounds crazy but this is how it works.

Marlene and Philip Chapman
Marlene and Philip Chapman(@crew2120)
9 years ago

Mr. Poynter,
We are relatively new here on a permanent basis but have fought for issues near and dear to our hearts such as the repair of the RR crossing at Front and Centre and the “Sidewalk to Nowhere” that is now is the works! When we, as a family put our all in for something we believe in, we don’t give up…..we are putting our all in to get you elected!!!
Again, as has been said many times, if we (collectively) want Mr Poynter elected….everyone must vote!!!

Ross Gass
Ross Gass (@guest_24919)
9 years ago

I think it my civic duty to point out that the Planning Advisory Board voted to approve the rezoning. Is anyone asking for the heads of those individuals?

I also think it is my civic duty to repost Charlie Corbett’s remarks concerning the the port, the firefighters union, his opponent in the upcoming, etc.

Charles Corbett‎Amelia -> Island Fernandina Beach Yulee Network
I have consistently read what I honestly believe in my heart, is biased journalism. Journalism, much like running government, is a messy business. This is undeniable. I follow the papers and the internet closely, and my choice to respond or not respond to publications, questionnaires and surveys is always a conscious decision made based on what I believe are the merits of the reporting quality of those publications. In pure form, un-biased journalism is a beautiful thing. It wields the power to expose truth to the public that they may otherwise never see.

It is very rare for me to write an editorial such as this one. I can honestly say my reluctance to do so is in very large part, a deep belief that the media doesn’t care to publish what I write anyway. Today, one more time, I will challenge this theory.

As the election draws to a close I have to tell you what I believe to be true. Whether you believe it or not is a decision you will have to make for yourselves. I will also circulate this on Facebook for everyone to see. As you are reading this you are seeing my piece. I don’t intend to debate with others, or debate on the merits of the choices I made as commissioner. I believe I have a strong record, and I stand by it.

I made choices that were not always popular. I campaigned on the promise to put at bay the massive debt that had been taken out by the city. I campaigned on traditional small government values, accountability, and I said I would shoot straight with you on what I think. Here are those thoughts:

1) The Port of Fernandina – My family has been here for decades. I grew up here. I have remembered and been part of the historic downtown Fernandina before many of you even knew this place existed. Everyone’s opinions and thoughts are important. In one form or another, the Port of Fernandina has been part of our small island’s culture and history since before Florida was part of the union. I believe that it is important for the Port of Fernandina, and its governing body, the Port Commission, to listen to what of all the people who live here have to say, not just a certain group of them. The port is part of Fernandina as much as American Beach or The Palace Saloon. We should continue to focus on responsible management of the Port. While the process to that place is not perfect, it must continue.

I received a very gracious thank you note from Faith Ross recently after meeting with her and others at the coffee shop where we spoke about the city’s finances, and the port. That letter is a matter of public record. I replied to her, and echoed the same statements as above. We need the Port and the citizens of the historic district to both have a spirit of cooperation in accomplishing what needs to be done to keep a correct balance between the port and the residents. I won’t always see eye to eye with everyone on how we accomplish this, but am confident we can accomplish it nonetheless.

2) Taxes and expenses – I have read pieces from certain published literature that referenced the raising of taxes. I’m going to give this to you in the numbers. In the fiscal year 2010/2011, when my opponent was commissioner, the tax rate increased +10.5. In fiscal year 2011/2012, it was raised +10.07.

My first year of commissioner, it has been published that taxes were raised +15.95, with my opponent being the no-vote. Well, if a politician voting to not raise taxes when he is up for re-election is a shock, you have been under a rock. He felt fine about tax increases the previous two years. It should be noted that despite the fact he voted no, the electorate saw the self-service of this and voted him out of office all the same.

Last year we adjusted the rate +3.3, and then in 2014 reduced taxes -2.2. This is the FIRST reduction in the past half-decade. This also coincides with the goal of having replenished the reserves depleted by previous commissioners during the forward-debacle. During the tenure of my opponent, the reserves were drained to below the state recommended minimum. In his previous election year my opponent also voted nay on raising the franchise fee, only to flip-flop on that position and vote in favor of raising the franchise fee later from 5.05 to +6.00. I voted not to raise the franchise fee.

What is also true is that I am not a fan of financing the future of Fernandina out to banks –despite that they transferred money between accounts, to give the impression of more uncommitted cash-flow, in order to secure this “historically low interest rate.” Historically, what wound up being the case, was that that commission took that money to have a slush fund, and had no concrete implementation to fulfill most of the construction projects that this money was supposed to finance.

The result? The result is that the money sat in an account untouched every month – except for the interest of approximately $20,000.00 we paid on our “historically low interest rate.” I’m not an anti-progress commissioner. Despite the fact that I took flack for it, I was the swing vote that supported actually using a small amount of this money, when appropriated the correct way, to fund the expansion of the Fernandina Beach library. Just some food for thought though to those of your still reading; If we had waited till the correct time to borrow what we ACTUALLY NEEDED, (money for the train depot and the library), we could have saved $20,000.00 (which despite a historically low interest rate – is a LOT of money), and most likely paid a lower origination fee for it.

Fiscal responsibility, and sound financial planning trump quick loans every time. While we’re on the subject of taxes, I’ve always wanted to address this seat tax business. My opponent may like to say he “paid all the taxes he was required to pay,” but that doesn’t change the fact that he practiced a double standard by making multiple claims about what type of restaurant he was to both local and state governments. First claiming your restaurant is a “take-out” and then claiming it is full service to get a 2COP beer and wine license is a double standard. They have a word for that. It’s called a lie. So as the current commission takes the heat and settles the impact-fee lawsuit, let us remember that fee was originally a brain child of my opponent himself. Further, it was one which he foxed his way out of paying. When we discuss taxes, not only did the base tax rate increase during his tenure significantly more than it has since I took office and we paid down the debt, he was largely responsible for the largest “fee” increase on businesses in the history of Fernandina Beach.

The Fire Union: First, let me say I have tremendous respect for first responders. It is one of the most difficult situations you can be in outside of military service. However, I’ve got to tell everyone I was pretty surprised when in October, the fire union (which had not officially endorsed at this time, though they did later), hosted a candidate meet and greet for my opponent and Ms. Lentz, while leaving both Commissioner Pelican, Roy G. Smith, and myself out. Further, this e-mail was sent from city e-mail, and as such at taxpayers’ time and expense. This is quite unusual, but not the first time the city fire department has shown a liking for Ex-Commissioner Poynter. During his previous tenure, he was the ONLY employee of the City of Fernandina Beach to use his job to get a discounted physical by taking advantage of a service offered to our local first responders. Now, I’ve heard rumors from members of the community that if Tim gets back into office, he’d like to take advantage of his office to call for dismissal of Joe Gerrity over the fire department incidents. Is that the price of endorsement perhaps? While I remind you that this is rumor, it is difficult to decide if this is the actual case.

In conclusion, the truth will set you free. I would be grateful for your support on December 9th, so I can continue to work to make Fernandina Beach once of the best places to live.

Steve Crounse
Steve Crounse (@guest_24928)
9 years ago
Reply to  Ross Gass

Your absolutely right Mr. Corbett I could not agree more. That article in the News Leader about Tim Poynter two days before the election was unbelievably biased. I’m really glad you pointed it out.

John P. Megna
John P. Megna (@guest_24920)
9 years ago

THE PEOPLE – CITIZENS – AND VOTERS OF FERNANDINA ARE THE ONLY ONES THAT CAN FIX THIS MESS. GO TO THE POLLS ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 9TH AND CAST YOUR BALLOT FOR POYNTER. PLEASE, GET AS MANY VOTERS OUT TO ELECT POYNTER. GET RID OF CORBETT!

tony crawford
tony crawford (@guest_24926)
9 years ago

Remember folks— you an vote early Downtown court house or the James S Page complex in Yulee. It is called a “mail in ballo” that you can fill out there and give it right back to them. Just VOTE On Dec 10th when you wake up for you morning coffee and the new commissioner is elected, he will be there because of you. It will be your choice or your fault. Please —–DON’T COMPLAIN ON THE 10TH ABOUT SOMETHING YOU COULD HAVE CHANGED ON THE 9TH

Andrew Curtin
Andrew Curtin(@bkdriverajcgmail-com)
9 years ago

A reminder,Some Poynterisms:
If you can’t afford to live here,move[words to that effect spoken at a commission meeting]
Look at those idiots out there[citizens outside City Hall]
The purpose of government is to spend money[Again,spoken at a commission meeting]
Folks,we ran this guy out of here two years ago because of his attitude and fiscal irresponsibility.There has been no change.Why on earth would we want him back?

Steve Crounse
Steve Crounse (@guest_24949)
9 years ago
Reply to  Andrew Curtin

Why would we want Mr. Poynter back.? Well for one thing we’ve seen what the opposition has to offer. With Mr. Poynter we have a individual that’s intelligent, thoughtful, listens to both sides of an issue is a successful businessman and has a vision for the future of the City of Fernandina beach. Which includes a good living environment, a thriving business community and prosperity for all. That’s my reasons. By voting for Spot Zoning of two lots in the Historic District and letting Kinder Morgan and there Minions OHPA commissioners out of the confines of the cage, so Kinder Morgan can turn our community into a Toxic Fossil Fuel Terminal. (phase one of the Master Plan) Mr. Corbett, Ms. Gass and Ms Pelican have shown our Town what their Vision is. Mr. Corbett would love to turn the clock back on this Town. Back to the 60’s Shrimping as good, Pogy Plant was turning out tons of fertilizer made from fish guts. Can you folks envision the sites and smells along the River Front? I’m sure that would help our tourist industry. Forgot Gass and Corbett don’t consider that a real industry. You know, it’s hard to envision The Concourse D’ elegance being held on Amelia Island in that Working mans environment. Something between for all of our citizens would be proper. Vote Poynter.

Ross Gass
Ross Gass (@guest_24963)
9 years ago

“Something in between” is what everyone wants. Most people in this city don’t have to imagine the smells of the working riverfront. Some people remember the fish processing plants where the shrimpers and commercial fishermen sold their catch. Some people remember the terrible smell of the Pogy Plant. Most reasonable people know that those two industries, along with the paper mills and our deep water harbor, are what made this island into what it is today. A lot of people, like myself, don’t want to see our nose cut off to spite our face. There has got to be a balance. I’m sure to the retiree crowd tourism seems like the best thing since sliced bread. Tourism is a cruel, cruel, mistress. Low wages. Seasonal work. No benefits. No retirement. No job security. It’s all rainbows and sunshine if you made your money else where and moved to Fernandina later in life so the money you’ve already made will go farther. But for those of us born and raised here, we have seen the passage of time and the loss of emphasis on the good paying jobs. We can’t all be real estate agents and t-shirt shop owners. Some of us don’t want to sacrifice 2-3 hours of our day in commute time to Jacksonville so we can afford to live on the island where we were born.
The Port doesn’t have a mind of it’s own. it doesn’t need a cage. It’s run by the elected officials on the OHPA. The Port is not going to turn into Chernobyl simply because two lots they already own are made available for parking or office space.
There has go to be a balance. The rising tide of tourism lifts most boats. You need the Pelicans and the Corbetts and the Gasses to balance out the interests of the wild eyed profiteers and the small town people of this community. The small town feel is one of the reasons people move here. Where is that going to come from if my generation gets priced out of our own hometown?
I’ll tell you what Mr Poynter thinks about that last bit; he thinks we should move and make way for the people with more money. That’s no vision for the future. that’s a vision for an investment portfolio.

Steve Crounse
Steve Crounse (@guest_24969)
9 years ago
Reply to  Ross Gass

Mr. Gass, I understand what your saying. We need a balance and we have a good start on the Island. I don’t know what your knowledge is concerning the goings on at our Port. This community has not got any idea what Kinder Morgan and The Ocean Highway and Port Authority have in mind for the utilization of our Port. So far what i do know is: The ten year master plan wants to increase container truck traffic through our streets by a factor of (4) around 1200 more trucks per day. The Port wants to increase Coal through put to 500,000 tons/ yr. the Dirty air Permit is on hold, Kinder Morgan never pulled it. They want to dredge the Amelia river to accommodate Class ( C ) Freighters and dredge the marsh area for a turn area. But most troubling is the talk of liquefied Natural Gas coming into our Port via train, tanker truck, or Pipelines to be shipped overseas. I’m not about to buy” a pig in a poke” I’ve read enough on Kinder Morgans web site, sightline institute, and ( http://timrileylaw.com/LNG.htm ) to know what the issues are with Kinder Morgan and LNG. you say you love this community, please take the time to read these. We all need to understand the issues at the Port. I really hope i’m wrong about this mess. OHPA commission needs to explain. There are other options for good jobs in this Town and your right we need them. I’m afraid that Pensions and Good benefits that we now back in the day are just not there.

Ross Gass
Ross Gass (@guest_24975)
9 years ago

Mr Crounse, I happen to be pretty informed. First off, as has been addressed previously, the Master Plan is flawed in that the goals stated were a “no holds barred” imagining. for example filling in the marsh. Sure, that would add capacity. but its absolutely impossible given the laws already on the books. Its my understanding The Master Plan is being reworked so that these sorts of strategies are removed.
“increase container truck traffic through our streets by a factor of (4) around 1200”
-This is impossible. Since my mother and many of our family friends worked at the port in the past, I know that all truck entering the port must go through the check in/weighing process at “the interchange”. At optimum speed, it takes 15 minutes per truck. thats 4 an hour, 96 at most per day running 24 hours a day. Again, the 1200 trucks is a “best case scenario” not a realistic goal.
” Coal through put to 500,000 tons/ yr.”
-it is my understanding that 0-500,00 tons was the minimum number available. (as in 0-500k, 500k-100k etc). And, when you are trying to find addditional revenue streams everything must be considered.
“dredge the Amelia river to accommodate Class ( C ) Freighters”
-given the deepening of the Panama Canal, these sorts of measures must be considered. More and larger ships are coming our way. The port would be doing itself a disservice to not give this option its due diligence. It will not happen in a vacuum, however, and there will be plenty of review were the plan be set in motion past the present stage. I also feel the same way about the LNG option. Just because they want to look into it, doesn’t mean they are breaking ground next week.
And, yes, the OHPA does need to explain. As noted here on the FO and other social media, they have done a terrible job presenting this plan and the consultants they hired to do the studies and help form the Master Plan did a poor job given the local attitude toward the port. Be that as it may, I do not believe the Port to be a rabid animal that might escape it’s cage and devour our sweet little town. The OHPA and KM need Fernandina and Fdna needs them. We have to find a balance.

John P. Megna
John P. Megna (@guest_25024)
9 years ago

Tuesday is the day – you and I change our City to A CITY COMMISSION THAT LISTENS TO THE CITIZENS OF FERNANDINA. GET OUT AND ELECT TIM POYNTER.