Property insurance carriers seeking large rate hikes on Florida policyholders

By John Haughey
The Center Square
August 10, 2020

(The Center Square) – A quadfecta of factors is merging into one bottom-line reality for Florida’s 6.2 million property insurance policyholders: significant rate hikes await when they next renew policies – if thinly capitalized carriers opt to renew them at all.

Tallahassee-based Capitol Preferred Insurance Co. (CPI) has filed a proposed 26.2 percent premium increase for its 84,000 customers, and its affiliate, Southern Fidelity Property & Casualty (SFPCI), has submitted a proposed 31.1 percent rate hike to the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation (OIR).

CPI and SFPCI join a growing list of insurers citing skyrocketing reinsurance costs, loss creep from 2017 and 2018 hurricanes, coastal flooding and excessive litigation in requesting across-the-board property insurance rate hikes.

State law requires insurers appear before OIR if they propose rate increases of more than 15 percent. Between 2013-19, only one did so.

Since December, however, at least eight insurers have requested rate hikes topping 15 percent, including Edison’s Insurance Co., nearly 22 percent; Velocity Risk, 28 percent; and National Specialty Insurance Co., 28 percent.

Numerous other carriers have filed for increases just under that 15 percent threshold. Security First, which initially sought a 17.5 percent increase, raised premiums 12.8 percent and didn’t renew 5,000 policies.

Universal Property and Casualty, the state’s largest carrier, has filed for a 12.4 percent increase; People’s Trust, 10.9 percent; AIG, 9.6 percent; Florida Family, 6.5 percent; and FedNat, 5.5 percent.

CPI writes business in South Carolina and Louisiana, in addition to Florida, and owns SFPCI, which has 113,000 policies across Florida, South Carolina, Louisiana and Mississippi.

CPI had 108,870 Florida policies as of May 3, according to OIR, making it one of the state’s top 10 homeowners insurance companies.

OIR approved CPI’s request in May to shed 23,800 policies it inherited from SFPCI in February 2019, leaving it with 84,000 Florida policies, “to protect the best interests of the public and policyholders.”

CPI initially proposed a 47 percent hike, amended it to 36.5 percent and then 26.2 percent after OIR issued a consent order in May allowing it to drop the 23,800 policies because without the cancellations the carrier “will continue to generate unsustainable losses.”

CPI reported net losses of $5.1 million in 2017, $17.8 million in 2018 and $25.7 million in 2019.

During a February OIR hearing, CPI/SFPCI President and CEO Jimmy Graganella said reinsurance costs and lawsuits are primary drivers in driving up rates, with loss creep and coastal flooding not related to hurricanes also contributing.

Florida’s insurance structure is based on reinsurance, essentially insurance for insurers, because many independents that emerged after major carriers abandoned the state after the 2004-05 hurricane seasons are thinly capitalized.

Many rely on private capital from hedge funds and other sources that are essentially gambling hurricanes won’t happen to incur mass losses.

After a decade without a landfall hurricane, 2017’s Hurricane Irma caused $17 billion in damage, and 2018’s Hurricane Michael as much as $12 billion, ending an era of “soft pricing.”

Because Florida allows claims to be filed three years after an event, reinsurers are hedging their bets by requesting carriers raise rates between 25 percent to 45 percent to account for loss creep from the 2017 and 2018 storms.

CPI also cited leaks and increasingly routine coastal flooding from rising sea levels as significant cost-drivers.

Graganella said although Florida lawmakers revised the state’s “assignment of benefits” (AOB) provision in 2019, excessive litigation continues to impose significant costs on insurers, with 36 percent of claims received by his companies the last year filed by attorneys on behalf of policyholders, up from 4 percent several years ago.

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Dennis Jay
Dennis Jay(@dennisjay)
3 years ago

Our state lawmakers should get rid of “assignment of benefits” in homeowners insurance. Lawyers continue to abuse it even though reforms have been passed — and we’re all paying for it. Most states do not allow assignment of benefits in homeowners. In its place, the state should give the state insurance department more authority to investigate and punish insurance companies that fail to pay claims quickly and fairly.

And while they’re at it, get rid of “Personal Injury Protection” in auto insurance. It’s just a slush fund for personal injury lawyers.

DAVE LOTT
DAVE LOTT(@dave-l)
3 years ago

The reinsurance market is the major factor as noted in the article. As premiums rise, there will be the temptation of homeowners with paid off mortgages to risk cancellation of their wind and flood damage policies under the mistaken impression that FEMA will bail them out. Additional reform is needed to reduce the impact of excessive litigation costs.

Frank Quigley
Active Member
Frank Quigley(@frank-quigley)
3 years ago

It is important to also look at the larger picture. Florida homeowners can expect to renew homeowners insurance @ 15-28% higher premiums going forward. Florida-based carriers are generally low on reserves or under-funded, and the reinsurance market has been under stress for a number of years. This will not improve. Ever.

This simply adds to the out-of-pocket for living in Fernandina Beach.

It’s high time for the City to adopt austerity, as the current tax planning and City expenditures are absolutely not sustainable.

Frank Quigley
Active Member
Frank Quigley(@frank-quigley)
3 years ago

It is important to also look at the larger picture. Florida homeowners can expect to renew homeowners insurance @ 15-28% higher premiums going forward. Florida-based carriers are generally low on reserves or under-funded, and the reinsurance market has been under stress for a number of years. This will not improve. Ever.

This simply adds to the out-of-pocket for living in Fernandina Beach.

It’s high time for the City to adopt austerity, as the current tax planning and City expenditures are absolutely not sustainable.