Submitted by Suanne Z. Thamm
Reporter – News Analyst
December 17, 2020
The 2021-2022 Fernandina Beach City Commission (FBCC) convened for the first time in Regular Session at 6 pm on December 15, 2020, immediately following the organizational meeting during which newly elected commissioners were sworn in and a new Mayor and Vice Mayor were installed.
The meeting lasted 2.5 hours and contained a lengthy presentation on the City’s current trash removal contract with Advanced Disposal, which was officially taken over by Waste Management at the end of October this year.
The new Commission made quick work of a suggestion that the City might consider selling its water/wastewater utility. Although there seemed to be some confusion if the question had been raised by a government-owned bailout company or a City Commissioner, Commissioners overwhelmingly rejected the suggestion following their discussion.
Commissioners unanimously approved a non-exclusive franchise agreement with Rollin’ Phat Scooters, LLC for guided and non-guided sightseeing motor scooter tours, following an amendment to eliminate Bosque Bello Cemetery from the approved tour route.
On Second and Final Reading Commissioners unanimously approved a series of voluntary annexations to bring parcels on South 14th and 15th Streets, Nectarine Street and Pappy’s Place into the City. For more information on these annexations see https://fernandinaobserver.com/city-news/fbcc-approves-voluntary-annexation-requests-to-add-39-acres-to-city-another-4-acres-to-follow/.
Waste Management and the yard debris quandary
City Commissioners viewed a presentation provided by Greg Huntington of Waste Management (formerly Advanced Disposal) on the status of trash collection services and the challenges facing both the company and the City’s residents under the current contract.
He explained the transition of the City’s trash collection services from Advanced Disposal to Waste Management effective October 30, 2020, while advising that for the most part the change in company ownership would be transparent to users in the near future.
He noted the increase in the volume of all waste collection — municipal household waste, recycling and yard debris — over the previous year, as well as the recent City survey which showed that while over 80 percent of respondents were satisfied with waste collection in general, a large percentage of respondents were dissatisfied with the collection of yard debris.
Huntington noted that the current situation is not tenable for either Waste Management or the City. He said that the two options for the FBCC to consider are these:
- Holding to the terms of the contract which require customers to bag and bundle all yard waste; or
- Continuing the current practice of picking up loose yard debris but at an increased cost that will allow Waste Management to purchase more trucks and add workers.
Huntington explained that under earlier contracts with the city, the yard debris had been dumped at a site at the City’s airport, where City staff mulched it for use within the City. However, when the City decided to “get out of the mulching business,” the contract haulers were required to transport the material to disposal sites an hour off the island. This meant that yard debris collection slowed, leading to customer dissatisfaction.
The City Survey conducted this past summer reflected a willingness of 52.63 percent of almost 600 respondents to pay an additional $5 each month to improve the pick up of yard debris under existing conditions. Huntington’s recent calculations projected that to improve service without requiring bagging and bundling as specified in the contract, would cost all residential customers an additional $6.97 per month bringing the total bill for sanitation services to $29.20 from its current $22.23.
The consensus of Commissioners seemed to be that those residents who produced yard waste would not want to bag and bundle that waste. They also expressed fears that the problems of illegal dumping would continue as well as outright refusal of some residents to follow the new rules. The City would then need to deal with the need to collect the waste that the trash haulers were not required to collect.
The other side of the argument, however, involved raising rates for all customers when not all customers generate yard waste.
Commissioners were not asked to vote on this matter following the presentation. However the matter will require a vote in January.
In Gwinnett County GA, yard waste pickup is an optional service. To get the once a week service, it is $60 paying for 6 months or $90 paying for 12 months. Yard waste clippings must be placed in paper bags and a maximum of 10 bags per week. Limbs and such must be bundled no more that 3′ in length and 4″ in diameter. So an $7/month increase seems reasonable given not having to bag the waste. Understand why the city stopped the mulch yard out at the airport, but maybe Waste Management would be willing to take on full responsibility for its operation to lower its overall expenses and restore quality service levels.
Why did the city discontinue mulching? Was it a service for the residents who could use it or could the city sell it commercially?
Also, does this mean WM didn’t do due diligence before closing its purchase or it did and thought it could sell the city on an increase? Or would an increase be a planned move to get the city pony up part of WM’s purchase price?
Your thoughts since you are always the sober voice of these issues?
I am all for everyone paying the extra $6.97 per month for yard waste collection. Case in point; my children are grown and paying taxes themselves. Ergo, I do no require public school education any more but I am required to pay heavy school taxes. Yard waste collection and good schools are, among other services, required to keep our wonderful community wonderful. Put on your big boy pants and let’s get this done!
Seriously? Where is the conversation about entertaining competitive bids when we are faced with a 33% increase in rates? Who is managing this process?
What is missing in the article is a comparison of revenue paid to waste management from year to year. I would also point out that waste in higher this year due to people being home because of covid and generating more waste working around their homes than nornal.
A 33% increase!!!. You’ve got to be kidding the people of Fernandina. I say rebid the whole waste contract since the
original contract wasn’t with Waste Management. I believe we may be able to get a better deal from someone else.
And I might add, they do a terrible job when they pick up yard waste. Also, The people in my area only see the yard
waste truck about once every two to three weeks if we’re lucky.
I’m for for redoing the whole thing.