Weekly comments from Dale Martin

Dale Martin
City Manager
Fernandina Beach

February 17, 2017 1:00 a.m.

City Manager Dale Martin

A common question for many local government professionals is “How are we doing?” It is typically to believe that we are doing well, but is that necessarily true? Is it possible to scientifically measure community satisfaction rather than gauging our effectiveness based upon letters to the editors, blog comments, or social media posts?

The International City/County Managers Association (ICMA) has long advocated the use of the National Citizen Survey (NCS), a community-based survey developed in cooperation with the National Research Center. Much of the information about the NCS can be found on the ICMA web site. The NCS solicits feedback from residents across a spectrum of issues relevant to the community and captures residents’ opinions within the pillars of a community (Community Characteristics, Governance, and Participation) and across eight central facets of community (Safety, Mobility, Natural Environment, Built Environment, Economy, Recreation and Wellness, Education and Enrichment, and Community Engagement).

Surveys can be designed to be completed either through traditional mail or web-based techniques. The surveys are scientifically sampled (approximately 1,500-1,800 households) to be based upon a representative cross-section of the community population, with multiple contacts with those selected to ensure adequate response rates. A non-scientific web-based option is also available- the community simply promotes participation in the survey. The surveys can also contain customized questions and reporting options to address specific needs.

When completed, the NCS provides multiple reports to communicate the results in a way that enables every audience – staff, elected officials, business owners, and residents – to quickly find the information they need and want. The local results can also be compared to those of other similar communities. Testimonials from municipal officials have indicated that the survey improved service delivery, strengthened communications with community stakeholders, and helped leaders identify clear priorities for use in strategic planning and budget setting.

The City Commission has annually conducted a visioning session. The goals that have emerged from those visioning sessions have a principal focus on the short-term: what do we want to address in the next fiscal year? City staff then works to incorporate those goals into the subsequent budget. It is the long-term perspective that tends to get overlooked. Even more troublesome, long-term efforts are often derailed by short-term memories. A scientific survey can establish a thoughtful foundation for legitimate long-term planning.

An additional component of the NCS is the opportunity to have a facilitator work with City officials. The facilitator will, over the period of a half-day, work to use the compiled data to develop long-term strategies and offer recommendations. This function may serve as a useful complement to the City Commission’s short-term efforts at its annual visioning workshop.

Other options for the survey include an expanded survey size, demographic comparisons, and an in-person presentation of the survey results. According to the ICMA web site, other Florida communities that have completed the NCS are Cape Coral, Miami Beach, and Winter Garden.

I believe that we are performing our duties in Fernandina Beach at least at a satisfactory level, but I have nothing more than anecdotal stories to either support or dispute that belief. We typically hear more loudly from those who point out our shortcomings, but we actually do hear more frequently, but quietly, from many who believe we are serving our community well. It would be nice to have some data to address specific areas in which improvement is needed and to reinforce and promote our areas of success.

I will examine the costs associated with the survey and assess the value that such a survey could have for our community. According to the NCS timeline, it appears that the entire process is approximately four-to-five months. If the survey merits consideration, if we start the process in August or September, the results could be in place for City Commission consideration at its next annual visioning session in December or January.

I look forward to continuing the discussion of the conducting the NCS in Fernandina Beach with City Commissioners and others in the community.

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Doug Adkins
Doug Adkins (@guest_48500)
7 years ago

Dale – you need to do a survey. The city is completely focused on a portion of the city and the city includes many other neighborhoods. I would support the survey as it needs to be used to help the commission get refocused on the larger policy issues rather than the operational problems that seem to dominate its focus. For instance the pension issues, the former DEP secretary estimated most municipalities were losing between 30 to 50% of their fresh drinking water due to leaking water lines. We know that the THM counts are high due to stagnant water in the lines which requires flushing to manage. The older sewer lines if their are leaking as well this could create a toxic brew below our feet that impacts are health. We should also look into why we lead the state in cancer cases. Remember quality of life is why people come here.

Angela Hughes
Angela Hughes (@guest_48503)
7 years ago

Doug-

What portion of the City do you think has exclusive attention. I think you might be reaching on that one. Also, I’m surprised you would even be concerned with that issue…

Pensions are a problem for a lot of cities throughout the U.S. but Fernandina has a comprehensive understanding of the budget concerns.

Lastly, do you even know anything about our drinking water or are you just spouting (pun intended, rhetorical question because I think you are…).

Dave Lott
Dave Lott(@dave-l)
7 years ago

Angela,
Good points. While the City’s two pension programs received a grade of failing in the last program evaluation done by the Leroy Collins Institute (http://collinsinstitute.fsu.edu/sites/collinsinstitute.fsu.edu/files/Tough%20Choices%20Report%20Card%20Update%20SEP%202014.pdf) that was in 2012 and was generally due to large percentage of unfunded liability. The strong performance of the stock market over the last couple of years has significantly aided in reducing that level. At no time has the City ever failed to make its required contribution to the pension program.
As the City’s water system, Doug’s wide paintbrush doesn’t apply to FB as the City’s water loss is neglible (less than 1%) and its quarterly water quality tests have consistently shown a TFM level less than that required to be out of compliance. The City’s water supply infrastructure has been designed to maximize a loop system of water flow and reduce static (dead end) lines that require periodic flushing.