Registered Voters: | 55,166 |
Ballots Cast: | 11,103 |
Voter Turnout: | 20.13% |
Precincts Completely Reported: | 16 / 16 |
Vote By Mail: | Partially Reported |
Early Voting: | Completely Reported |
Election Day: | Completely Reported |
REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS |
Choice | Percent | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Ander Crenshaw (REP) | 75.54% | 5,950 | ||
Ryman Shoaf (REP) | 23.69% | 1,866 | ||
OVER VOTES (REP) | 0% | 0 | ||
UNDER VOTES (REP) | 0.77% | 61 | ||
7,877 |
GOVERNOR AND LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR – REPUBLICAN |
Choice | Percent | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Yinka Abosede Adeshina (REP) | 0.77% | 61 | ||
Elizabeth Cuevas-Neunder (REP) | 5.67% | 447 | ||
Rick Scott (REP) | 90.49% | 7,128 | ||
OVER VOTES (REP) | 0.13% | 10 | ||
UNDER VOTES (REP) | 2.93% | 231 | ||
7,877 |
COUNTY COMMISSIONER DIST 2 |
Choice | Percent | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mike Boyle (REP) | 42.8% | 3,371 | ||
Steve Kelley (REP) | 54.09% | 4,261 | ||
OVER VOTES (REP) | 0.04% | 3 | ||
UNDER VOTES (REP) | 3.07% | 242 | ||
7,877 |
COUNTY COMMISSIONER DIST 4 UPC |
Choice | Percent | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Barry V. Holloway (REP) | 46.31% | 5,142 | ||
George V. Spicer (REP) | 47.97% | 5,326 | ||
OVER VOTES (REP) | 0.05% | 5 | ||
UNDER VOTES (REP) | 5.67% | 630 | ||
11,103 |
GOVERNOR AND LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR – DEMOCRATIC |
Choice | Percent | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Charlie Crist (DEM) | 56.74% | 1,393 | ||
Nan H. Rich (DEM) | 39.51% | 970 | ||
OVER VOTES (DEM) | 0.45% | 11 | ||
UNDER VOTES (DEM) | 3.3% | 81 | ||
2,455 |
ATTORNEY GENERAL |
Choice | Percent | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
George Sheldon (DEM) | 54.54% | 1,339 | ||
Perry E. Thurston (DEM) | 34.46% | 846 | ||
OVER VOTES (DEM) | 0.08% | 2 | ||
UNDER VOTES (DEM) | 10.92% | 268 | ||
2,455 |
CIRCUIT JUDGE, 4TH CIRCUIT |
Choice | Percent | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Anthony Paul Penoso (NON) | 19.99% | 2,219 | ||
Michael “Mike” Sharrit (NON) | 71.04% | 7,888 | ||
OVER VOTES (NON) | 0.05% | 5 | ||
UNDER VOTES (NON) | 8.93% | 991 | ||
11,103 |
The number of undervotes in the District 4 race is interesting especially since the large number was 3.5 times the margin of Spicer’s victory and twice the number of undervotes in the District 2 race. Would be interesting to get other’s take on the reasons for such a large undervote.
I don’t think the number of undervotes has much significance in any of the races … they are very small numbers. The Holloway-Spicer was the only race decided by all voters (except for the judge contest) so naturally it had more undervotes. But more importantly, perhaps some Democrats voting in this race simply didn’t like either one … they had no dog in that fight … and just opted to skip it. And maybe slightly more Republicans than on average had no preference or liked neither one. Keep in mind Boyle and Kelley are both well known having both been county commissioners. Spicer was the lesser known commodity in these races. Perhaps people did not like Holloway but didn’t think they knew enough about Spicer … the most common reason for an undervote is not so much a lack of preference (suggesting dissatisfaction with both) but not really knowing enough about both the candidates (see the large undercount on the judge’s contest). But most importantly, those that did vote a preference (Democrats and Republicans) chose Spicer. It does not diminish Spicer’s victory over an incumbent and sends a clear message to elected officials on spending. One can argue all day about the wisdom of borrowing money and certain expenditures being wise investments … but for a lot of people they just can’t afford the taxes they are paying now.
You cannot complain about government if you did not vote – democracy in action